“virus” FOI confessions/failures from Denmark

June, September, 2020:

The folks at Statens Serum Institut, Denmark confessed to Alex Holmsted that they have no documentation to convince them of the existence of the alleged “SAR-COV-2” (translation):

The Statens Serum Institut can state that we have now carried out a journal search for documentation that has convinced the Statens Serum Institut about the real existence of SARS-CoV-2, the alleged cause of COVID19 and moreover, we have in some other way tried to locate relevant documents. Statens Serum Institut can note that we are not in possession of the requested documents...”

And, this is what the folks at Sundhedsstyrelsen [“Danish Health Authority”] confessed when challenged by Alex to provide “Bibliographies, held by the Danish Health Authority, in which can be found articles showing that Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated and purified“:

“The Danish Health Authority hereby states that we are not in possession of such documents.”

Original responses and translation:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Denmark-The-Statens-Serum-Instituttet-Alex_Holmstedt_w-English.pdf

So how did the people who fancy themselves “health officials” react when confronted in person with their own “no records” confessions/failures? Let’s have a look:

The Disruption Corona Press Conference Denmark Sept 29th 2020…the missing virus [SARS-CoV-2]…
Kudos to Alex Holmsted and Kristofer Krarup 🙂

August/September 2022:

Danni and Tonny in Denmark filed FOIs for records of any “virus” that authorities recommend children be “vaccinated” against being isolated/purified. 

Danni described the responses:

A doctor from Sundhedsstyrelsen [“Danish Health Authority”] says they don’t hold scientific evidence. They base the recommendations on the fact that they’ve been vaccinating children for decades.  

And a lawyer from Statens Serum Institut searched the journal database and came up with nothing. He could not find anything matching my request.  I had used the template from one of your FOIs on SARS COV 2.”

Both responses:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Denmark-Statens-Serum-Institut-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf

June – September 2023:

Ruth Thorresen received 2 letters from Jesper Bonde who acts as Molecular Biologist, Senior Researcher in the Pathology Department of Hvidovre Hospital, Denmark.


Jesper offered Ruth a home test for “HPV”, which he insists exists and causes cervical cancer.

So, on June 26, 2023 Ruth wrote back to Jesper (pg 6) requesting under the Danish Act on Public Access to Public Administration full access to all studies/reports held by the institution that:

“… describe and scientifically prove the isolation and purification (via maceration, filtration and use of ultracentrifugation; commonly referred to as “isolation”) of “HPV” i.e. “Human Papillomavirus” directly from a sample taken from a sick patient, where the sample material has not first been mixed with other genetic material (such as monkey cells, cow serum, etc.)… and [all studies/reports that] scientifically prove that HPV causes cervical cancer.”


Ruth has kindly shared the resulting communications and provided English translations.

On June 27, 2023 Jesper responded (pg 8, emphasis is mine):

“If you have any doubts about the quality of the HPV home test or the examination method, you are always welcome to contact your GP for a regular cervical screening test.


So per Jesper’s advice, if you’re not convinced that “HPV” exists or causes cancer, the solution is to opt for the regular “HPV” test. Hmm.

Jesper then implied that all studies listed on Pubmed adhere to the scientific method, and that the existence on Pubmed of studies mentioning X and “cause of…” Y is valid scientific evidence that X causes Y… which is demonstrably false and quite a ridiculous suggestion.

all the information you request is publicly available. On Pubmed.gov, a freely available scientific search engine, you get 3,137 scientific articles with the keywords [HPV AND cause of cancer] and 4,120 scientific articles on [HPV AND cancer]. The articles are published in the period 1983-2023.”


Next, Jesper provided 3 useless, distracting and irrelevant references:

“Below you will find three references to publicly available documents describing the screening and HPV and cancer

• The Danish Health Authority: https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2018/Screening-for-livmoderhalskr%C3%A6ft— anbefalinger-maj-2018.ashx

• WHO/International agency on Cancer Research: https://monographs.iarc.who.int/wpcontent/uploads/2018/06/mono100B-11.pdf

• In addition, the correlation between HPV infection and cancer resulted in the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2008/hausen/facts/


The 1st is a pdf from the people at Sundhedsstyrelsen (“Danish Health Authority”) entitled “Screening for cervical cancer – recommendations”, which is not a scientific study/report. The 2nd is a webpage stating “This page cannot be found”. The3rd is a page about Nobel Prize winner Harald zur Hausen. Yawn.

Finally, Jesper confessed that he and the folks at Hvidovre Hospital (where he acts as Senior Researcher and Laboratory Manager in the Department of Pathology) could not provide or cite any records showing that “HPV” causes cervical cancer – which of course they could do if they had any to provide or cite.

And he completely sidestepped Ruth’s request for records of the imaginary “HPV” being found in and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/feces of a sick person, even though this is a necessary step for demonstrating the existence of particles with the purported “HPV” “genome” and proteins – which would require sequencing and characterization of purified particles.

Quote (emphasis is mine):

“Access as described to “All studies and/or reports in the custody of or administered by you, your hospital, other hospitals, universities, Statens Serum Institut, the Danish Health Authority and/or any other entity worldwide that scientifically prove that HPV causes cervical cancer.” cannot be met as we as a hospital cannot grant access to documents on behalf of the institutions and agencies you mention, nor worldwide. Please contact the relevant institutions, agencies and organizations.”


Screenshot from Ruth’s English translation:


Ruth wrote back to Jesper on July 4, 2023 (pg 9), giving him a chance to redeem himself:

I have received two letters signed by you, offering me a HPV home test and also containing several statements about HPV. You repeat one of them in your answer, that the HPV test is “a cancer prevention screening”.

I have looked through countless scientific studies on pubmed and medical journals. No one does control experiments and no one isolates anything in the literal sense of the word, despite the technology allowing it. In other words, they don’t meet the criteria to be called science. If this is not scientifically proven, then the statements about cancer causes and preventive studies are consequently also unproven.

So I assume that you and your hospital have irrefutable evidence to claim that cervical cancer is caused by HPV, so you and your hospital can offer HPV home testing as a cancer prevention test to all women between 23 and 64 years old in Denmark.

Is there any scientific evidence behind your statements and offers that meet the criteria I have set out in the freedom of information request?”


Jesper responded within 30 minutes (pg 10, emphasis is mine):

“As I wrote, document access request is not relevant as all requested information is publicly available.

As I read your request and your latest email, you are asking for a librarian service to find the information you are looking for, and with all due respect, I cannot provide that. I can suggest contacting the Royal Library, which manages the collection of scientific journals. The service I would like to provide, however, is to forward you a few of the, in my opinion, more central sources on the use of HPV analysis for cancer prevention. However, I’m not going to discuss methodology, validity or significance with you in this regard. Time does not permit this.

Basis for decision and review of evidence for the basis for decision can be found in the references already submitted, including the popular scienceRECOMMENDATION from the Nobel Committee.”


Screenshot of Ruth’s translation:


Communications:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Hvidovre-Hospital-Denmark-HPV-original-and-translated-PACKAGE.pdf

Someone shared a relevant meme with me, here it is (thanks to whoever created it):

May be an image of 1 person and text


Next, Ruth’s “HPV” FOI response from Statens Serum Institut: